ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Explainable machine learning for predicting childhood anemia in Sub-Saharan Africa using population-based DHS Data (2016-2024).
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Childhood anemia remains a major public health challenge in Sub-Saharan Africa, adversely affecting physical growth, cognitive development, and child survival. The pooled prevalence across 26 countries exceeds 60%, underscoring the need for accurate and scalable prediction tools to support targeted interventions.This study used pooled Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data (2016-2024) from 26 Sub-Saharan African countries, including 110,251 children aged 6-59 months. Multiple machine learning models (Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Extra Trees, Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and MLP) were trained using hyperparameter tuning with 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC, with 95% confidence intervals estimated via bootstrapping. Model comparisons were conducted using the DeLong test, and SHAP was used for model interpretability.The CatBoost model demonstrated the best overall performance (ROC-AUC = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.840-0.848), followed closely by XGBoost and LightGBM. All machine learning models significantly outperformed logistic regression (p < 0.001, DeLong test), although the absolute improvement in discrimination was modest (ΔAUC ≈ 0.04). The models demonstrated moderate discriminatory ability, with relatively low to moderate sensitivity (recall ≈ 0.33-0.41) depending on the model and classification threshold. SHAP analysis identified residence type, height-for-age z-score, country, and child age as the most influential predictors.Machine learning models demonstrated moderate to strong discriminatory performance in predicting childhood anemia using DHS data. Although improvements over traditional models were statistically significant, the relatively low sensitivity limits their effectiveness as standalone screening tools. These findings highlight the importance of early childhood nutrition (particularly during 6-23 months), reduction of chronic undernutrition, and context-specific public health strategies. Integration of predictive analytics into national health systems may support risk stratification and resource allocation in high-burden settings. However, findings should be interpreted in light of the cross-sectional design and lack of external validation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.