ArticlePloS one2026
Characterization of adverse reactions to two antihistamine drugs: A descriptive analysis from WHO-VigiAccess.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAntihistamines like azelastine and levocabastine are key in treating allergies, including allergic rhinitis, conjunctivitis, and urticaria. This study analyzed adverse drug reactions linked to these drugs using data from the WHO VigiAccess database, comparing their adverse drug reaction profiles to help physicians choose lower-risk options for personalized treatment.
methodsA retrospective descriptive analysis was used, with data from WHO-VigiAccess on azelastine and levocabastine. Included were global patient demographics (age, gender, location) and details on illness systems/symptoms from direct and annual adverse drug reaction reports. Adverse drug reaction percentages for each drug were calculated for comparison.
resultsOver the study period, 11,592 adverse events related to both drugs were reported. Both had high rates of General disorders and administration site conditions. Azelastine showed more Nervous system disorders. Levocabastine had higher rates of endocrine disorders, injury/poisoning/procedural complications, and Nervous system disorders. The top five adverse events were: General disorders (4463, 36.7%), Nervous system (3475, 28.6%), Gastrointestinal (1558, 12.8%), Respiratory (1515, 12.5%), and Injury/poisoning (871, 7.2%). For SOC-reported ADRs, > 10% incidence occurred in 2 azelastine cases and 4 levocabastine cases.
conclusionClinicians should note antihistamine ADRs. This study identifies common and specific reactions reported to the WHO, aiming to guide safer, more judicious use of these drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.