Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42585182›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Reef fish escape responses selectively match predator attack speeds.

Sara Linde Neven, Lena Faber, Benjamin T Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara Linde NevenDepartment of Theoretical & Computational Ecology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9996-0882
Lena FaberDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Benjamin T MartinDepartment of Theoretical & Computational Ecology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals must continually balance foraging with the risk of predation. In complex natural environments, this means quickly distinguishing between threats and harmless situations. We investigated how site-associated coral reef fishes escape in response to visual cues mimicking predator attacks, using controlled underwater presentations of looming stimuli at varying speeds. We measured escape responses across species and social contexts, and compared them to predator attack speeds observed in the same habitat. Escape probability increased sharply with the speed of the looming stimulus, with no responses at low speeds. Stimulus speeds that triggered escape responses matched those of predator attacks, whereas speeds similar to those of cruising predators never triggered a response. The two species differed in behavior: Brown Chromis ranged farther from shelter and responded more readily, whereas Bicolor Damselfish stayed close to shelter and responded less. Contrary to expectations, social context did not affect responses. These findings demonstrate that reef fish are highly sensitive to the approach speed of objects, with species-specific behavior further shaping their responses. By combining realistic visual threats with natural predator attack data, this study offers insight into how animals make rapid escape decisions in complex, real-world environments.

Indexed as

Coral ReefsEscape ReactionFishesPredatory BehaviorAnimals

Identifiers

PMID42585182
PMCPMC13465847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.