ArticlePloS one2026
"Sexual harassment definitely involves a hierarchical transgression": Key informants´ discourses on sexual harassment in European universities.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how university members conceptualize sexual harassment is crucial, as their perceptions influence recognition, reporting, and response to the issue. The aim of this study was to explore the discourses of key university informants about sexual harassment within universities, including student representatives, university staff, and institutional representatives in equality and diversity. A qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews (November 2023 to April 2024) with 90 key informants from six universities located in Austria, Belgium, Italy, Poland, Portugal, and Spain. Data were analyzed using Critical Discourse Analysis. Results show that sexual harassment is perceived as a multidimensional phenomenon encompassing physical, verbal, non-verbal, offline, and online behaviors. Participants' accounts consistently emphasized the transgression of interpersonal boundaries, the absence of consent, power imbalances, and negative consequences on victims-survivors' well-being. Participants' definitions fell along a continuum of three discursive approaches- normative, experience-based, and integrative-which varied according to gender and institutional role. Regarding potential victim-survivors, two discourses emerged: an intersectional discourse frames vulnerability as the result of overlapping social inequalities-such as gender, age, hierarchical position, sexual orientation, ethnicity, migration background, disability, and/or economic dependence; and a situational discourse emphasizing risks associated with structural dynamics of academia, including hierarchy and dependency, regardless of individual characteristics. Concerning potential perpetrators, a hierarchical discourse was dominant among participants, alluding to men in positions of authority and leadership within the university. Two minoritarian and alternative discourses emerged: a peer perpetration discourse, situating harassment among individuals of similar hierarchical status, particularly students; and a psychological characteristics discourse, explaining perpetration in terms of individual traits, such as narcissism, manipulation, or egocentrism. Our findings suggest the need for university policies that integrate intersectional and gender-transformative perspectives and promote egalitarian and safer academic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.