ArticlePloS one2026
Price premiums for meat products with sustainability labels.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With consumers' growing demand for products labeled as having been produced without practices or substances, agricultural producers are given the chance to distinguish their products through eco-labels and other claims. During the last few decades, a number of food labels have been developed to communicate sustainability information, with consumers interested in the carbon footprint and practices of agriculture in recent years. This study investigates the retail premiums for such sustainability labels as greenhouse gas (GHG) emission-reducing practices and other potentially relevant sustainability labels on meat products, including organic, grass-fed, gluten-free, and whether genetically modified organisms were used in production. Prices and labeling information about beef, pork, and chicken products in selected stores from 48 states were collected via web-scraping and investigated for sustainability labels. Market-observed premiums for such labels as reduced-GHG and sustainable practices were investigated alongside impacts of geography on product prices. Our results showed significant premiums for almost all sustainability claims investigated. Among the claims studied, Organic and Grass-fed labels consistently carried positive premiums across all three meat types, with pork products generally exhibiting the highest premiums and chicken products the lowest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.