ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Pregnant women's needs regarding the Tdap vaccine: Insights from Reddit discussions.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tdap vaccination during pregnancy is essential to protect the fetus, yet the vaccination rate in the United States remains suboptimal. Little is known about pregnant women's perspectives or the factors that influence their Tdap vaccination decisions. Given that many pregnant women turn to social media and online sources for health information, this study aims to analyze social media posts from Reddit to better understand the needs of pregnant women regarding the maternal Tdap vaccine. This qualitative study analyzed the posts from Reddit collected from October 2020-2023. After screening, 86 posts were included for analysis. Thematic analysis was conducted. Four key themes emerged: information seeking, vaccine hesitancy, regulation and public policy, and concerns related to contact with newborns. Pregnant women actively sought information to clarify concerns and better understand healthcare providers' advice. Some reported a lack of vaccine recommendations from providers, and inconsistent recommendations for the vaccination timing by the providers. Vaccine hesitancy and refusal were also expressed. In addition, confusion arose around policies recommending Tdap for family members and close contacts, leading to interpersonal conflict and resistance. Many posts described pushback from family members. Pregnant women face multifaceted needs and challenges related to vaccine information, policies, and emotional support. Healthcare providers should initiate the vaccine recommendation with clear information, considering the patients' literacy and address concerns. Additionally, public health agencies and professional organizations should prioritize promoting the maternal Tdap vaccine by supporting access, including cost coverage.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.