ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Fatal phosphine poisoning after accidental aluminium phosphide exposure: a forensic case report.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aluminium phosphide is a widely used fumigant pesticide that releases phosphine (PH₃), a highly toxic gas responsible for severe and often fatal poisoning. Phosphine intoxication is characterized by rapid clinical deterioration, severe metabolic acidosis, cardiovascular collapse, and multiorgan failure. From a forensic perspective, the diagnosis may be challenging because autopsy findings are frequently nonspecific. We report a fatal case of phosphine poisoning following accidental exposure to aluminium phosphide (Phostoxin) in a 41-year-old electrician. Clinical, biochemical, autopsy, and toxicological findings were analyzed, with particular emphasis on classical qualitative toxicological methods. The patient collapsed at his workplace after entering a recently fumigated storage facility, resulting in accidental inhalation of phosphine gas. Laboratory investigations revealed severe metabolic acidosis (pH 6.81) with markedly elevated lactate concentrations (up to 25 mmol/L), indicating profound mitochondrial dysfunction. Biochemical findings demonstrated rapid progression of multiorgan failure, including severe myocardial injury, hepatic damage, renal failure, and coagulation abnormalities consistent with disseminated intravascular coagulation. Despite intensive treatment, the patient died 37 h after hospital admission. Forensic autopsy revealed nonspecific findings, including organ congestion and edema, while histological examination was limited by extensive postmortem autolysis. Toxicologicalanalysis of postmortem samples confirmed the presence of phosphine using classical qualitative reactions, including the silver nitrate and ammoniummolybdate tests. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges associated with phosphine poisoning and emphasizes the importance of integrating clinical, biochemical, and forensic findings in establishing the cause of death in suspected pesticide exposures. In addition, it underlines the continued relevance of classical toxicological methods as reliable and accessible tools for confirming phosphine exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42584821What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.