ArticleCJEM2026
Planning the development of an AI-driven decision support architecture for the recognition of sudden cardiac arrest by 9-1-1 telecommunicators: report of a community engagement and brainstorming meeting.
Article in CJEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesSudden cardiac arrest is a leading cause of mortality in Canada (40,000 treatable deaths annually). Despite the benefits of 9-1-1 telecommunicator-assisted CPR, agonal (reflexive/ineffective) breathing often leads to misdiagnosis and delayed intervention. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models, may improve cardiac arrest recognition during 9-1-1 calls. This study aimed to identify community-informed requirements for integrating AI models into 9-1-1 ambulance communications centers to enhance rapid cardiac arrest recognition and timely response.
methodsWe hosted a CIHR-funded planning and dissemination meeting at the Ottawa Paramedic Service. The qualitatively driven study involved diverse community members including emergency physicians, telecommunicators, paramedics, cardiac arrest survivors, AI model developers, and policymakers. We used a structured Miro board exercise before, during, and after the meeting to facilitate participant input. Five pre-identified themes guided the exercise: (1) essential must-haves in a useful AI application, (2) considerations for integration with 9-1-1 system, (3) policy/ethical considerations, (4) burning questions, and (5) missing community members.
resultsParticipants emphasized the need for high cardiac arrest interpretation accuracy, low false activation rates, multilingual capabilities, and explainable AI model outputs. Integration concerns included compatibility with computer-assisted dispatch systems, platform independence, and redundancy during outages. Ethical considerations focused on privacy, data sovereignty, liability, and bias mitigation. Participants raised questions about AI model's ability to interpret voice cues, background audio, and caller distress. Gaps in community representation were identified, including accessibility experts and Ministry information technology specialists.
conclusionThis planning exercise identified critical technical, ethical, and operational requirements for AI model integration into 9-1-1 ambulance communications centers. Community member insights will inform future development and validation of an AI-driven decision support architecture aimed at improving cardiac arrest recognition, reducing time to CPR initiation, and enhancing equity in emergency response. The findings support a patient/telecommunicator-centered, responsible approach to AI model deployment in prehospital care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42584805What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.