ReviewJournal of molecular modeling2026
Computational techniques to study breast cancer scaffolds for antiangiogenesis: a review.
Review in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextBreast cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Tumor angiogenesis plays a crucial role in breast cancer progression, making angiogenesis-associated pathways attractive therapeutic targets. Computational drug discovery approaches, including virtual high-throughput screening (VHTS), molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and binding free energy calculations, have emerged as valuable tools for identifying and optimizing anticancer compounds. This review evaluates the application of these computational techniques in the discovery of antiangiogenic therapeutic candidates for breast cancer.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted across Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Following screening and eligibility assessment according to predefined inclusion criteria, 38 studies published between 2015 and 2025 were included in the qualitative synthesis. The selected studies investigated computational approaches targeting angiogenesis-related pathways, including VEGFR-2, STAT3, HER2, PI3K/Akt, and SphK1 signaling. RESULTS AND
conclusionsThe reviewed studies demonstrated that VHTS, molecular docking, ADMET prediction, molecular dynamics simulations, MM-GBSA/MM-PBSA analyses, and QSAR modeling effectively facilitate hit identification and lead optimization. Several compounds, including triazolopyrazine derivatives, curcumin, liquiritin, and novel STAT3 inhibitors, exhibited promising antiangiogenic activity and favorable binding characteristics, highlighting the potential of computational approaches in advancing breast cancer drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42584761What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.