Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42584751›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026

Determinants of Non-Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Treatment in Pancreatic Cancer: A Classification Tree Analysis.

Manish Tripathi, Ioannis Liapis, Nritya Nair, Marcus Sirianno, Alexis Kennedy, Smita Bhatia, Annabelle L Fonseca

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manish TripathiInstitute of Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Ioannis LiapisInstitute of Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Nritya NairInstitute of Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Marcus SiriannoInstitute of Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Alexis KennedyEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Auburn, AL, USA.
Smita BhatiaInstitute of Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Annabelle L FonsecaInstitute of Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. afonseca@uabmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4972-5139

Funding

U.S. Department of Defense HT9425-24-1-0859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-receipt of guideline-concordant treatment (GCT) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with worse outcomes. Studies have identified associated factors, but less is known about how these factors co-occur within patient subgroups at the time of presentation to oncology care.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with PDAC treated at two academic centers. Candidate variables available at presentation were selected a priori across demographic, clinical, socioeconomic, and healthcare utilization domains. Classification and regression tree (CART) models were used to identify conditionally defined subgroups associated with non-receipt of GCT. Models were developed using an 80/20 training/test split with repeated cross-validation.

resultsOf 1040 patients, 337 (32.4%) did not receive GCT. In both unpruned and pruned models, Area Deprivation Index (ADI) defined the initial split. Among patients with ADI ≥7, non-receipt of GCT was more common among those entering care through the emergency department, with further stratification by race, social support, and timeliness of care. Among patients with ADI <7, stratification was based on age, social support, and performance status. In sensitivity analyses excluding age, ADI remained the initial split, with downstream stratification based on cancer screening, insurance, social support, and albumin. The model demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.849 on the training set and 0.662 on the independent test set.

conclusionNon-receipt of GCT in PDAC is associated with distinct clinically identifiable patterns involving socioeconomic context, access to care, and patient vulnerability at presentation, highlighting potential targets for early intervention.

Identifiers

PMID42584751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.