ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Determinants of Non-Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Treatment in Pancreatic Cancer: A Classification Tree Analysis.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ASO Author Reflections: Identifying Patients Before Treatment Pathways Break Down: From Risk Factors to Actionable Care Pathways.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNon-receipt of guideline-concordant treatment (GCT) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with worse outcomes. Studies have identified associated factors, but less is known about how these factors co-occur within patient subgroups at the time of presentation to oncology care.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with PDAC treated at two academic centers. Candidate variables available at presentation were selected a priori across demographic, clinical, socioeconomic, and healthcare utilization domains. Classification and regression tree (CART) models were used to identify conditionally defined subgroups associated with non-receipt of GCT. Models were developed using an 80/20 training/test split with repeated cross-validation.
resultsOf 1040 patients, 337 (32.4%) did not receive GCT. In both unpruned and pruned models, Area Deprivation Index (ADI) defined the initial split. Among patients with ADI ≥7, non-receipt of GCT was more common among those entering care through the emergency department, with further stratification by race, social support, and timeliness of care. Among patients with ADI <7, stratification was based on age, social support, and performance status. In sensitivity analyses excluding age, ADI remained the initial split, with downstream stratification based on cancer screening, insurance, social support, and albumin. The model demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.849 on the training set and 0.662 on the independent test set.
conclusionNon-receipt of GCT in PDAC is associated with distinct clinically identifiable patterns involving socioeconomic context, access to care, and patient vulnerability at presentation, highlighting potential targets for early intervention.
Identifiers
42584751What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.