SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026
Reduced-port robotic surgery versus multiport robotic surgery in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reduced-port robotic surgery, including single-site and single-port approaches, has been increasingly applied in endometrial cancer. However, its clinical value compared with conventional multiport robotic surgery remains uncertain. To systematically compare perioperative outcomes and safety between reduced-port and multiport robotic techniques used for endometrial cancer surgery. Following the PRISMA 2020 recommendations, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis that was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261443180). Relevant publications were retrieved by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from their inception until April 2026. Comparative studies evaluating reduced-port robotic surgery (single-site or single-port) against conventional multiport robotic surgery were eligible for inclusion. Treatment effects for continuous variables were pooled as mean differences, while binary outcomes were combined as odds ratios, each with 95% confidence intervals. A random-effects model was consistently applied in all analyses to accommodate anticipated methodological and clinical heterogeneity among the included studies. Eight comparative studies involving 905 patients (350 in the reduced-port group and 555 in the multiport group) met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in operative time between reduced-port and multiport robotic surgery (MD = 12.54 min, 95% CI: -7.76 to 32.84; P = 0.23). Compared with multiport robotic surgery, the reduced-port approach was associated with modest reductions in estimated blood loss (MD = - 14.83 mL, 95% CI: -29.25 to - 0.41; P = 0.04) and postoperative hospital stay (MD = - 2.12 days, 95% CI: -4.19 to - 0.06; P = 0.04). However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously given the substantial heterogeneity observed across studies. No significant differences were identified in transfusion requirement (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.09-3.16; P = 0.50), conversion to open surgery, intraoperative complications, overall postoperative complications, or Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications (all P > 0.05). Postoperative pain scores were comparable between groups at both 6 and 24 h. Subgroup analysis suggested a potential reduction in early postoperative pain with single-port robotic systems, although this finding did not reach statistical significance in the overall analysis. The available evidence suggests that reduced-port robotic surgery represents a viable option for selected patients with endometrial cancer, with broadly similar short-term perioperative outcomes to conventional multiport surgery. Potential modest reductions in estimated blood loss and postoperative hospital stay were observed; however, the clinical relevance of these differences remains uncertain because of the small absolute effect size and substantial heterogeneity among studies. While no overall benefit in postoperative pain was observed, potential differences between platforms, particularly single-port systems, warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42584727What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.