Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42584704›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Use, understanding, and perceptions of gut microbiome research and practices in oncology.

Courtney B Cross, Maya R Davies, Elin Irestorm, Clifton P Thornton, Caitlin W Elgarten, Hannah R Wardill, Madison T Stein, Yin Ting Cheung, Dori M Beeler, Jason L Freedman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Courtney B CrossSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia. courtney.cross@adelaide.edu.au.
Maya R DaviesSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.
Elin IrestormDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Clifton P ThorntonCenter for Pediatric Nursing Research & Evidence-Based Practice, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA.
Caitlin W ElgartenDivision of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Hannah R WardillSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.
Madison T SteinRowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, New Jersey, USA.
Yin Ting CheungSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Dori M BeelerDepartment of Supportive Oncology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer, Charlotte, USA.
Jason L FreedmanDivision of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe gut microbiome has gained increasing recognition as an important factor influencing cancer treatment efficacy and toxicity. However, translation of this knowledge to deliver clinical benefit has been hampered by inconsistent approaches to both biospecimen sampling and investigation of microbial-based interventions, potentially reflecting inherent biases and/or barriers across research environments. Accordingly, we aimed to characterize the current practices and perceptions surrounding the gut microbiome among members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC).

methodsA mixed-methods survey, probing current research and/or clinical use, plans, and perceptions of the gut microbiome in oncology, was developed in 2022 and distributed MASCC-wide via REDCap. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive analyses, and qualitative responses were independently dual-coded using inductive thematic analysis.

resultsOut of 117 respondents, the majority (83%) held the belief that the gut microbiome plays an important role in disease states such as cancer. 44.4% of survey respondents reported ongoing research or clinical practice regarding the gut microbiome at their center, with 70.5% also expressing an interest in developing such a program. Qualitative analysis revealed 6 main themes: (1) state of the evidence, (2) significance of the microbiome, (3) uncertainty, (4) aspirations, (5) preferences, and (6) critique.

conclusionsThis survey identifies general concordance on the importance of the gut microbiome in cancer. Despite interest in this field, there is a clear need for resource support (i.e., funding and infrastructure) and increased expertise to support high-quality trials generating the evidence required for implementation of microbial-based sampling or therapeutics in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMedical OncologyNeoplasmsAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesGut microbiomeMedical oncologyPediatric oncologySupportive oncology

Identifiers

PMID42584704
PMCPMC13469402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.