ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Disproportionality analysis of adverse events associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, comprehensive real-world comparisons of their safety profiles, temporal patterns, and demographic variations remain limited. This study aims to evaluate and compare the adverse event (AE) landscapes of four FDA-approved TKIs using post-marketing surveillance data. AE reports were extracted from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. Disproportionality analysis, utilizing the reporting odds ratio (ROR), was conducted to identify safety signals. The temporal patterns of AE onset were characterized using Weibull shape parameter analysis. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed to explore the influence of gender and age on AEs reporting. Imatinib exhibited the most extensive signal spectrum, while Ripretinib has recently surpassed Imatinib in annual reporting volume. Regorafenib demonstrated the shortest median time-to-onset (10.5 days), with a high incidence of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and hypertension. Sunitinib was uniquely associated with endocrine disorders, specifically hypothyroidism. Weibull analysis categorized all four TKIs under an "early failure" pattern, indicating that the highest risk of AEs occurs during the initial treatment phase. Subgroup analyses revealed that males and elderly patients were more prone to hospitalization in patients receiving Ripretinib, whereas younger patients receiving Sunitinib showed a higher likelihood of cardiopulmonary failure. This study delineates distinct safety profiles and temporal risk kinetics for GIST-targeted TKIs. The findings underscore the necessity of intensive early monitoring, particularly for Regorafenib, and suggest that clinical vigilance should be tailored to patient-specific factors to optimize treatment adherence and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42584674What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.