Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42584555›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2026

Global prevalence of hypomineralised second primary molars: an updated systematic review with a meta-analysis.

E Q Calixto, C M M T Lopes, J F S Dantas, L M Lemos, L L Costa, P B Santos

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E Q CalixtoDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
C M M T LopesDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
J F S DantasDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
L M LemosDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
L L CostaDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
P B SantosDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil. patricia.bittencourt@ufrn.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide an updated review of the literature and systematically estimate the global prevalence of hypomineralised second primary molars (HSPM).

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, SciELO and LILACS electronic databases following PRISMA guidelines. The grey literature search was conducted on Google Scholar. Observational studies reporting prevalence data of HSPM were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Prevalence Studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

resultsSixty-one studies were included in the quantitative synthesis, comprising 52,874 participants and 127,841  primary molars. The pooled prevalence of HSPM was 10.7% (95% CI 8.0%-13.4%; I

conclusionThe estimated global pooled prevalence of HSPM was 10.7% at the child-level and 5.2% at the tooth-level, representing an increase compared with previous global estimates, with geographic region contributing to its wide variability.

Indexed as

Hypomineralised second primary molarsMeta-analysisPaediatric dentistryPrevalenceSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.