Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42584535›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2026

User Experiences with Blocking Software and Gambling Recovery: Exploring Motivation, Perceptions & Recovery Supports.

Dilushi Chandrakumar, Catherine Yang, Sue Bin Oh, Sally M Gainsbury

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dilushi ChandrakumarBrain & Mind Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia. dilushi.chandrakumar@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1886-0255
Catherine YangBrain & Mind Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Sue Bin OhBrain & Mind Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Sally M GainsburyBrain & Mind Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9641-5838

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gambling blocking software can be downloaded onto a user's device to prevent them from accessing online gambling sites, including those in offshore jurisdictions. This study investigated user experiences with a gambling blocking software and examined its relationship with holistic recovery from gambling problems. A cross-sectional survey was administered to current blocking software users internationally (N = 156). Measures assessed lifetime gambling severity, software acceptability and satisfaction, motivations for uptake, use of additional supports, software breaches, and recovery outcomes using the multidimensional Recovery Index for Gambling Disorder. Participants were predominantly male, engaged mainly in online gambling, and most reported moderate to severe lifetime gambling disorder. The blocking software demonstrated high acceptability and satisfaction, with users valuing its perceived effectiveness, free access, and comprehensive site blocking. Participants reported greatest recovery in gambling reduction, urge coping, and recovery wisdom domains, while lower scores were observed in life functioning, interpersonal relationships, and mental health. Regression analyses did not identify gambling severity, blocking duration, software breaches, or number of supports used as significant predictors of recovery, although social support was positively associated with recovery in exploratory models. Qualitative feedback highlighted perceived benefits of the blocking software alongside participant-identified suggestions for stronger blocking mechanisms, increased personalisation, and extended or permanent blocking options. Findings suggest that gambling blocking software may support aspects of recovery, particularly behavioural control, compared to broader recovery domains. Further longitudinal research is needed to clarify long-term outcomes and optimal integration with complementary supports.

Indexed as

Blocking softwareConsumer perspectivesGambling disorderRecovery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.