ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2026
Psychometric evaluation of separate anxiety and depression item banks - potential supplements to the EORTC CAT Core.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer's computerized adaptive test instrument, the EORTC CAT Core, provides dynamic, individualised assessment across 14 health-related quality of life domains, including emotional functioning (EF), which encompasses anxiety and depression. When one of these symptoms is of primary interest, separate scores may better support clinical decision-making and increase measurement sensitivity. The aim here was to evaluate separate item banks for anxiety and depression as potential supplements to the EORTC CAT Core.
methodsResponses to 33 candidate EF items from 1,023 cancer patients were available from the original EF item bank project. Expert-based content classification was followed by psychometric analyses, including confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), item response theory (IRT) model calibration and evaluation, differential item functioning (DIF) analyses, and CAT simulations to assess measurement properties of the two item banks.
resultsExperts allocated nine items to anxiety and 17 to depression while seven items were judged to assess something else. CFA supported unidimensionality for each item bank. All items demonstrated acceptable IRT model fit, and no DIF of practical relevance was identified. CAT simulations indicated greater measurement precision than fixed 1- and 2-item scales, with potential sample size savings of up to 30% for anxiety and 50% for depression.
conclusionWell-functioning and psychometrically sound item banks can be formed for anxiety and depression, respectively. These findings support the use of separate anxiety and depression CATs as potential supplements to the EORTC CAT Core for more targeted assessment. Further studies are needed to confirm the content validity of the two item banks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.