ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Free energy perturbation and machine learning-assisted identification of potential MAP3K8 hit molecules: a comprehensive structure- and ligand-based studies.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MAP3K8, also known as COT or Tpl2, is a serine/threonine kinase that plays a pivotal role in regulating the MAPK signaling pathway and pro-inflammatory cytokine production, making it an attractive therapeutic target for inflammatory disorders and cancer. In this study, an integrated ligand- and structure-based virtual screening workflow was used to identify potential MAP3K8 inhibitors. A pharmacophore model derived from the co-crystal ligand bound to the COT kinase domain was used to screen the ChEMBL, PubChem, and ZINC databases, yielding 20,566 unique molecules. Sequential filtering through RMSD and binding-score thresholds, RDKit-based similarity searching, AutoDock Vina molecular docking, ADMET evaluation, and ChemMASTER-guided clustering reduced the dataset to four structurally diverse lead candidates designated as PM1, PM2, PM3, and PM4. All four molecules preserved the canonical hinge-binding pharmacophore of the reference ligand and exhibited binding energies between - 9.0 and - 10.2 kcal/mol, ranking more favourably than the co-crystal ligand with - 8.6 kcal/mol. The 200 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations confirmed the structural stability of the complexes, supported by favourable RMSD, RMSF, RoG, SASA, hydrogen-bond, PCA, and free energy landscape profiles. MM-GBSA calculations revealed that the binding free energies of PM2, PM3, and PM4 were - 42.12, - 38.46, and - 36.96 kcal/mol, respectively, outperformed the co-crystal ligand with - 34.36 kcal/mol, while FEP analysis identified PM3 with - 14.59 kcal/mol as the most thermodynamically favourable test compound, followed by PM2 and PM4. The convergence of docking, dynamics, and free-energy results prioritized PM2, PM3, and PM4 as promising MAP3K8 hit candidates, which require further experimental validation and lead optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42584524What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.