ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Multimodal deep learning with a joint uncertainty quantification scheme for drug-target interaction prediction.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AI-driven prediction of drug-target interaction (DTI) has emerged as a critical component in modern drug discovery and development. However, this approach is constrained by model and data uncertainties, which substantially affect its reliability and accuracy in DTI prediction. To overcome these limitations, we introduce EUQTri-DTI, a novel evidence-guided uncertainty quantification-based multimodal deep learning framework for DTI prediction. Specifically, EUQTri-DTI is designed to integrate three modality-specific networks to encode 1D protein sequences, 2D molecular images, and 3D drug structures. Here, a bidirectional cross-attention mechanism is employed to facilitate information exchange between different modalities. Additionally, we develop a joint uncertainty quantification scheme by calculating the weight summation of evidential uncertainty and prediction entropy from the aforementioned output, enabling a more comprehensive and nuanced assessment of uncertainties. Experiments are presented to demonstrate that EUQTri-DTI achieves stable and competitive performance through multiple evaluation metrics on three benchmark datasets, compared to baseline and state-of-the-art methods. Specifically, EUQTri-DTI achieves ROC-AUC and PR-AUC values of 85.28% and 84.53% on DrugBank, 93.45% and 83.02% on KIBA, and 92.41% and 85.32% on Davis, respectively. Moreover, the uncertainty analyses indicate that misclassified samples generally exhibit higher uncertainty, supporting sample-level confidence assessment and reliability-aware decision making. Overall, EUQTri-DTI combines competitive predictive performance with sample-level reliability assessment and shows potential for uncertainty-aware virtual screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42584520What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.