Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42584482›Full record

ArticleChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[The German Surgery Congress from the perspective of young surgeons; expectations and barriers : Results of a nationwide online survey].

Sebastian Schaaf, Perspektivforum Junge Chirurgie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie, Stefanie Brunner, Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Junge Chirurgie (CAJC) der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV), Frederik Schlottmann, Junge Forum der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Plastische, Rekonstruktive und Ästhetische Chirurgie (DGPRÄC), Sabine Drossard, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendchirurgie (DGKJC), Benedikt J Braun, Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie (BDC) and 10 more

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Sebastian SchaafKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz, Rübenacher Str. 170, 56072, Koblenz, Deutschland. pfjc@dgch.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1920-7090
Perspektivforum Junge Chirurgie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie
Stefanie BrunnerKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Junge Chirurgie (CAJC) der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV)
Frederik SchlottmannKlinik für Plastische, Ästhetische, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
Junge Forum der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Plastische, Rekonstruktive und Ästhetische Chirurgie (DGPRÄC)
Sabine DrossardKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendchirurgie (DGKJC)
Benedikt J BraunKlinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen/BG Klinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie (BDC)
Louisa SchuffertKlinik und Poliklinik für Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendchirurgie (DGKJC)
Dominik Adl AminiCentrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Junge Forum O&U der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DGOU)
Joscha MulorzKlinik für Gefäß- und Endovaskularchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Junge Forum der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gefäßchirurgie und Gefäßmedizin (DGG)
Romina RöschAbteilung für Thoraxchirurgie, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Atrin PezeshgiDeutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Randa HarakiDeutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Thomas Schmitz-RixenDeutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe German Surgery Congress (DCK) represents a central platform for scientific exchange and continuing medical education in the surgical disciplines in Germany; however, participation rates among young surgeons appear disproportionately low relative to the target population.

objectiveThe study assessed the expectations, barriers to participation and potential areas for improvement of the DCK from the perspective of young surgeons. MATERIAL AND

methodsAn anonymous web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted among young surgeons in Germany. The questionnaire included sociodemographic data, prior congress experience, barriers to participation, expectations regarding content and formats and open-ended responses to general perception of the DCK. The qualitatively and quantitatively collated data were exploratively analyzed.

resultsA total of 226 responses were analyzed. The overall willingness to participate was high (90.3%). The main barriers identified were lack of institutional support/leave (38.1%), high costs (22.1%) and insufficient information about the congress (14.2%). Content-related factors played a minor role. Participants prioritized practice-oriented formats, particularly hands-on courses (50.9%), interactive sessions (33.6%), mentoring and networking opportunities (46.9%). Expectations were largely consistent across subgroups.

conclusionLow participation of young surgeons in the DCK appears to be primarily driven by structural and organizational barriers rather than lack of interest. The findings highlight that the further development of the DCK does not primarily depend on expanding the program but on a targeted orientation toward the needs of young surgeons and a reduction In structural access barriers. A stronger emphasis on practice-oriented continuing education, mentoring, interactive formats and hybrid concepts could sustainably improve the attractiveness and accessibility of the DCK.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCongresses as TopicEducation, Medical, ContinuingGeneral SurgerySurgeonsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansInternetMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesCareer developmentContinuing medical educationMentoringProfessional conferencesSurgical training

Identifiers

PMID42584482
PMCPMC13601097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.