Observational studyJournal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS2026
RFC1 Repeat Expansions in Chronic Idiopathic Axonal Polyneuropathy: Prevalence, Phenotype, and Diagnostic Implications.
Observational study in Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsChronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP) accounts for approximately 20%-30% of adult-onset axonal polyneuropathies. Pathogenic RFC1 repeat expansions have emerged as a frequent cause of idiopathic sensory neuropathy, but their recognition in routine clinical practice may be challenging, particularly in the presence of potentially confounding comorbidities. We aimed to determine the prevalence of pathogenic RFC1 repeat expansions in a well-defined CIAP cohort, characterize the associated clinical and electrophysiological phenotype, and evaluate whether coexisting well-controlled diabetes mellitus (DM) or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) may hinder recognition of RFC1-related neuropathy.
methodsWe performed a retrospective observational study of adult patients with CIAP followed at a tertiary neuromuscular unit. All patients underwent RFC1 genetic testing. Clinical and electrophysiological features were compared between RFC1+ and RFC1- patients in the full cohort and after exclusion of patients with DM or MGUS.
resultsNinety patients met CIAP criteria and were analyzed. Twenty-four (27%) carried biallelic pathogenic AAGGG repeat expansions in RFC1, of whom 6 (25%) had coexisting DM or MGUS. Compared with RFC1- patients, RFC1+ individuals more frequently exhibited dysautonomic symptoms, unsteadiness, history of falls, need for walking support, chronic cough, impaired vibration sense in the upper limbs and up to the knees in the lower limbs, brisk upper-limb reflexes, mild cerebellar signs, an abnormal head-impulse test, and a positive Romberg's test. Most of these differences persisted after exclusion of DM or MGUS. Electrophysiological studies in RFC1+ patients showed widespread sensory nerve involvement, including the upper limbs, with relative motor sparing, whereas RFC1- patients exhibited a more typical length-dependent pattern.
interpretationBiallelic AAGGG repeat expansions in RFC1 were identified in 27% of patients with CIAP. Specific clinical and electrophysiological features may help distinguish RFC1-related disease from other forms of CIAP and identify candidates for genetic testing, even in the presence of potentially confounding comorbidities such as well-controlled DM or MGUS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.