Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42584239›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of community psychology2026

Becoming resilient: Community-driven change and the Civic Capacity Index.

David MacPhee, David Chrislip, Patti Schmitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of community psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David MacPheeDepartment of Human Development & Family Studies, Prevention Research Center, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2927-1387
David ChrislipSkillful Means, Boulder, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6532-1532
Patti SchmittOffice of Engagement and Extension, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.

Funding

Boettcher Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the principal features of successful community governance is that it is collaborative and thus dependent on a community's ability to work together. However, there are no valid, comprehensive means to assess a community's capacity to respond to civic challenges in collaborative ways, and that are predictive of community resilience and well-being. In this study, we describe the conceptual foundations of the Civic Capacity Index (CCI) and the multiple methods used to validate it. Findings from a large statewide sample show the CCI's scales to have high internal reliabilities and conform to a bifactor model, using confirmatory factor analysis. As hypothesized, CCI scores are predictive of multiple measures of community processes that in theory should be related to civic capacity; e.g., trust in governance, social control and cohesion, and community connectedness; public health indicators such as child abuse and suicide rates; and especially community resilience and well-being, even a year after baseline. The empirical findings align with the conceptual basis of the CCI, in particular, the association between a community's civic capacity and resilience. This tight-knit relationship has profound implications for promoting community resilience by building civic capacity.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationResilience, PsychologicalCooperative BehaviorHumansassessmentcivic capacitycollaborative governancecommunity resilienceinclusion

Identifiers

PMID42584239
PMCPMC13614427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.