Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42584230›Full record

ArticleSoft matter2026

PolyRapid: automated high-throughput screening of polymers using a computational workflow.

Lois Smith, Samuel Ericson, Vittoria Fantauzzo, Chin Yong, Paola Carbone, Alessandro Troisi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Soft matter, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lois SmithDepartment of Chemistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZD, UK. lois.smith@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0853-8676
Samuel EricsonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. Paola.Carbone@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9134-6652
Vittoria FantauzzoDepartment of Chemistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZD, UK. lois.smith@liverpool.ac.uk.
Chin YongComputational Materials and Molecular Science, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6346-7383
Paola CarboneDepartment of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. Paola.Carbone@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9927-8376
Alessandro TroisiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZD, UK. lois.smith@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5447-5648

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput computational screening of polymers offers a powerful way to address the imbalance between the vast number of polymers synthesised for diverse applications and the relatively small subset that can be studied using atomistic simulations. This work presents PolyRapid: an automatic workflow designed to enable the rapid and efficient screening of an extensive polymer library. In this work it is deployed on a library of 103 homopolymers. The workflow integrates an automated annealing protocol with adaptive control, allowing for reproducible simulations with minimal human intervention and minimisation of the computational cost. To this end, we test a number of quantitative conformational and energetic convergence metrics. It achieves equilibration in 95% of systems within four 30 ns annealing cycles, and 100% within nine annealing cycles saving, for our dataset, more than 2500 hours of compute compared to a fixed equilibration protocol. The simulation results are compared with experimental data and compiled into a publicly available repository which reports polymer temperature, tacticity and crystallinity. The availability of a homogenous large set of simulations enables the adoption of machine learning approaches for a variety of tasks. We exemplify this possibility by proposing rapid machine-learning-based method to predict the (computed) polymer density (F1-score = 0.91) and (experimental) glass transition temperature (F1-score = 0.76), using both chemical fingerprint representations and physically meaningful MD-derived descriptors.

Identifiers

PMID42584230
PMCPMC13464363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.