ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2026
Multi-Atlas-Based Segmentation of Pediatric Vocal Tract Anatomy in Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSegmentation of velopharyngeal and vocal tract anatomy is crucial for quantifying structures and analyzing dynamics during speech. Automatic methods are needed to replace labor-intensive and poorly reproducible manual segmentation. To address this, we compared four multi-atlas-based methods to determine which provides the most accurate segmentation of the tongue, velum, and adenoid and how segmentation accuracy varies with the number of temporal frames.
methodFive spatiotemporal atlases of speech tasks were built, each with around 80 frames. We performed diffeomorphic registration of 10-40 frames of each atlas, then propagated labels to evaluate how the number of frames impacts performance. Four label fusion techniques-majority voting label fusion (MVLF), simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE), multi-atlas label fusion (MALF), and corrective learning (CL)-were applied to evaluate segmentation accuracy. Performance was assessed using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) values across increasing numbers of input frames (10-40).
resultsCL consistently produced the highest segmentation accuracy, with average DSC improving from 0.89 at 10 frames to 0.92 at 40 frames. In contrast, MVLF, STAPLE, and MALF showed relatively flat trends, with DSC values ranging from 0.82 to 0.87. Statistical analysis confirmed that only CL exhibited a significant positive association between frame count and DSC.
conclusionsCL demonstrates superior performance in segmenting pediatric vocal tract structures in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, particularly as the number of temporal frames increases. These findings support the use of CL in analyzing speech-related anatomy and highlight its potential to replace manual segmentation in small specialized data sets. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.33107006.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.