ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026
FDA Approval Summary: Erdafitinib for FGFR3-Altered Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03390504 (A Phase 3 Study of Erdafitinib Compared With Vinflunine or Docetaxel or Pembrolizumab in Subjects With Advanced Urothelial Cancer and Selected FGFR Gene Aberrations), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3 Study of Erdafitinib Compared With Vinflunine or Docetaxel or Pembrolizumab in Subjects With Advanced Urothelial Cancer and Selected FGFR Gene Aberrations
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
On January 19, 2024, the FDA granted traditional approval to erdafitinib for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) with susceptible FGFR3 genetic alterations, as determined by an FDA-approved companion diagnostic test, whose disease has progressed on or after at least one line of prior systemic therapy. Substantial evidence of effectiveness was obtained from BLC3001 (THOR, NCT03390504) Cohort 1, which was an open-label trial in which 266 patients with FGFR3-altered la/mUC were randomized 1:1 to receive erdafitinib (8 mg once daily with potential up-titration to 9 mg) versus chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or vinflunine 320 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Statistically significant improvements in OS, progression-free survival, and objective response rate were demonstrated for erdafitinib compared with chemotherapy. Median OS was 12.1 months (95% CI: 10.3, 16.4) in the erdafitinib arm and 7.8 months (95% CI: 6.5, 11.1) in the chemotherapy arm (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.88; p=0.0050). Based on BLC3001 Cohort 2 results showing no OS benefit of erdafitinib versus pembrolizumab (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.92, 1.51), the approval includes a limitation of use: erdafitinib is not recommended for the treatment of patients who are eligible for and have not received prior PD-(L)1 inhibitor therapy. This article summarizes the data and the FDA thought process supporting traditional approval of erdafitinib, including the rationale for not requiring specific types of prior systemic therapy in the indication statement.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.