ArticleChemical reviews2026
AI for Accelerated Materials Discovery: From Generative Design to Autonomous Realization.
Article in Chemical reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is fundamentally transforming materials discovery, shifting the paradigm from labor-intensive trial-and-error approaches to data-driven, automated workflows. This review examines emerging AI methodologies for accelerated materials discovery, with particular emphasis on how computational design, data infrastructure, synthesis planning, and autonomous experimentation can be connected into experimentally grounded workflows. We begin by surveying generative models for inverse materials design, tracing the evolution from early variational autoencoders and generative adversarial networks to recent diffusion models, Bayesian flow networks, flow-based architectures, transformer-based methods, and large language model-driven approaches for the de novo generation of crystalline materials with targeted properties. We then discuss physics-informed and data-efficient AI strategies that incorporate domain knowledge to enhance the model generalizability and robustness in low-data regimes. The emergence of multimodal foundation models, which integrate heterogeneous data modalities including crystal structures, text, and spectroscopic information into unified representations, is examined as a key enabler for cross task generalization. We further review AI-driven synthesis planning algorithms and autonomous self-driving laboratories that bridge the persistent gap between the computational design and experimental realization. Critical infrastructure challenges, including database limitations, FAIR data principles, and knowledge-graph construction, are also addressed. By highlighting both demonstrated capabilities and persistent limitations, this review aims to guide the reliable application of AI toward materials discovery workflows that connect candidate generation, synthesis feasibility, experimental feedback, and data provenance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.