Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42584105›Full record

ArticleChemical reviews2026

AI for Accelerated Materials Discovery: From Generative Design to Autonomous Realization.

Jaehwan Choi, Seongmin Kim, Junkil Park, Junyoung Choi, Sunggi An, Yousung Jung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jaehwan ChoiDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering (BK21 four), and Institute of Chemical Processes, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul08826, Korea.ORCID 0009-0003-2057-0764
Seongmin KimDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering (BK21 four), and Institute of Chemical Processes, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul08826, Korea.
Junkil ParkDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering (BK21 four), and Institute of Chemical Processes, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1770-7291
Junyoung ChoiDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering (BK21 four), and Institute of Chemical Processes, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul08826, Korea.
Sunggi AnDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon34141, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0006-2735-9234
Yousung JungDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering (BK21 four), and Institute of Chemical Processes, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2615-8394

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2024-00464386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is fundamentally transforming materials discovery, shifting the paradigm from labor-intensive trial-and-error approaches to data-driven, automated workflows. This review examines emerging AI methodologies for accelerated materials discovery, with particular emphasis on how computational design, data infrastructure, synthesis planning, and autonomous experimentation can be connected into experimentally grounded workflows. We begin by surveying generative models for inverse materials design, tracing the evolution from early variational autoencoders and generative adversarial networks to recent diffusion models, Bayesian flow networks, flow-based architectures, transformer-based methods, and large language model-driven approaches for the de novo generation of crystalline materials with targeted properties. We then discuss physics-informed and data-efficient AI strategies that incorporate domain knowledge to enhance the model generalizability and robustness in low-data regimes. The emergence of multimodal foundation models, which integrate heterogeneous data modalities including crystal structures, text, and spectroscopic information into unified representations, is examined as a key enabler for cross task generalization. We further review AI-driven synthesis planning algorithms and autonomous self-driving laboratories that bridge the persistent gap between the computational design and experimental realization. Critical infrastructure challenges, including database limitations, FAIR data principles, and knowledge-graph construction, are also addressed. By highlighting both demonstrated capabilities and persistent limitations, this review aims to guide the reliable application of AI toward materials discovery workflows that connect candidate generation, synthesis feasibility, experimental feedback, and data provenance.

Identifiers

PMID42584105
PMCPMC13474564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.