ArticleChemSusChem2026
Number and Position of Methoxy Substituents Govern Photophysics and Visible-Light Photocatalysis in Earth-Abundant Cu(I) Complexes.
Article in ChemSusChem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Earth-abundant Cu(I) photosensitizers are promising systems for visible-light-driven photocatalysis, but further design guidelines are required to relate targeted ligand modification to catalytic performance. Herein, we present five new heteroleptic Cu(I) complexes with two or three methoxy substituents at the bathocuproine backbone and two single-crystal structures to assess how substitution number and position affect structure, photophysics, redox properties, and photocatalytic performance. While all complexes retain the expected distorted tetrahedral Cu(I) coordination motif, their properties depend strongly on the substitution pattern. In particular, ortho/para substitution is much more effective than meta substitution in prolonging the excited-state lifetimes (up to 1.46 µs) and emission quantum yields (up to 8.1%). Benchmark studies in energy-transfer and electron-transfer photocatalysis reveal that there is no single optimal substitution pattern for all reactions. Ortho/para substitution appears to be advantageous for excited-state performance and triplet sensitization, whereas meta substitution benefits from higher excited-state potentials, highlighting that the catalytic performance of these complexes depends strongly on the specific substrate and reaction mechanism. Overall, these results demonstrate that the position of the methoxy substituents is more decisive than their number and establish application-specific methoxy substitution as a useful strategy for tailoring noble-metal-free Cu(I) photosensitizers toward photocatalytic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.