ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026
Design of an Adaptive Model for Intelligent Car Seats Based on Human Pose Recognition.
Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electric vehicles (EVs) are moving toward greater intelligence and personalization, but the dynamic adaptability of current vehicle seats no longer meets drivers' comfort and safety needs. To address insufficient posture adaptation and low recognition accuracy for occluded joints, this study proposes an intelligent seat adaptive adjustment model on the basis of human pose recognition. Kinect V2 was used to collect drivers' posture data, and features were extracted through a cascaded pose analysis network (PSN) integrating a spatial transformer network, squeeze-and-excitation module, and convolutional block attention module. The network recognized 16 joint points with an average accuracy of 0.87, a PCK@0.2 (percentage of correct keypoints within 20% of limb length) of 0.92, and a mean per joint position error (MPJPE) of 3.2 mm. Considering biomechanical and vehicle physical constraints, a seat adjustment model was established and optimized using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to coordinate seat fore-aft position, height, and backrest angle. Simulated driving experiments suggested preliminary effectiveness: Subjective comfort increased by about 30%, lumbar muscle activity decreased by 39.5%, and posture estimation plus parameter generation remained within 0.3 s. These findings indicate preliminary feasibility for intelligent seat posture assistance under simulated conditions, whereas practical safety validation in real driving conditions remains for future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.