ArticleIndian journal of pharmacology2026
Gastrointestinal adverse events related to monoclonal antibodies: A comprehensive evaluation of data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.
Article in Indian journal of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMonoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are frequently used in the treatment of various types of cancer and autoimmune diseases, but their causal association with Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders is still unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the frequency and nature of GI adverse events (AEs) associated with mAbs reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
objectivesThe study's primary objective was to investigate the GI-AEs linked with mAbs, determine the demographic trends, and evaluate the clinical characteristics (age groups, seriousness, fatality, etc.) from the reported cases. Secondary objectives included using disproportionality signal analysis to find mAb-AEs combinations with significant associations. MATERIALS AND
methodsCases involving mAbs from the FAERS database were examined for the period from first authorization until June 30, 2023. The AEs were taken from the "GI Disorders" System Organ Class as standardized Preferred Terms. The characteristics of the cases, such as gender, age, seriousness, and co-suspect drug usage, were examined in detail. Proportional relative risk, IC025, χ2, and Ncomb metrics were used in disproportionality analysis to find the meaningful associations between a particular mAb and GI-AE.
resultsA total of 115,346 cases were evaluated, and the most common GI-AEs were caused by rituximab, bevacizumab, and denosumab. Constipation, vomiting, nausea, abdominal pain, and diarrhea were the most commonly reported AEs. 89.17% of cases had serious AEs, and 14.33% had fatal outcomes. Bevacizumab, atezolizumab, and rituximab had the highest death rates. 29 signals were detected by performing the disproportionality analysis for mAbs-GI-AEs combinations having significant values, especially for enterocolitis, ascites, GI perforation, and some other AEs as well, from GI disorders. The highest number of signals was identified by bevacizumab.
conclusionsThis study highlights the strong correlation between mAbs and GI disorders, especially for mAbs such as atezolizumab, rituximab, and bevacizumab. The results emphasise the necessity of increased pharmacovigilance to keep an eye on these AEs and enhance patient safety. Improving patient safety during mAb therapy requires constant safety surveillance and additional research. Further investigation into the mechanisms underlying these relationships could lead to more effective management options for patients undergoing mAb therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.