Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42583973›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of pharmacology2026

Gastrointestinal adverse events related to monoclonal antibodies: A comprehensive evaluation of data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.

Nitin Kumar, Vivekanandan Kalaiselvan, Mandeep Kumar Arora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nitin KumarDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical and Population Health Informatics, DIT University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Vivekanandan KalaiselvanSecretary-cum-Scientific Director, Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission (IPC), Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Mandeep Kumar AroraDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical and Population Health Informatics, DIT University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are frequently used in the treatment of various types of cancer and autoimmune diseases, but their causal association with Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders is still unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the frequency and nature of GI adverse events (AEs) associated with mAbs reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

objectivesThe study's primary objective was to investigate the GI-AEs linked with mAbs, determine the demographic trends, and evaluate the clinical characteristics (age groups, seriousness, fatality, etc.) from the reported cases. Secondary objectives included using disproportionality signal analysis to find mAb-AEs combinations with significant associations. MATERIALS AND

methodsCases involving mAbs from the FAERS database were examined for the period from first authorization until June 30, 2023. The AEs were taken from the "GI Disorders" System Organ Class as standardized Preferred Terms. The characteristics of the cases, such as gender, age, seriousness, and co-suspect drug usage, were examined in detail. Proportional relative risk, IC025, χ2, and Ncomb metrics were used in disproportionality analysis to find the meaningful associations between a particular mAb and GI-AE.

resultsA total of 115,346 cases were evaluated, and the most common GI-AEs were caused by rituximab, bevacizumab, and denosumab. Constipation, vomiting, nausea, abdominal pain, and diarrhea were the most commonly reported AEs. 89.17% of cases had serious AEs, and 14.33% had fatal outcomes. Bevacizumab, atezolizumab, and rituximab had the highest death rates. 29 signals were detected by performing the disproportionality analysis for mAbs-GI-AEs combinations having significant values, especially for enterocolitis, ascites, GI perforation, and some other AEs as well, from GI disorders. The highest number of signals was identified by bevacizumab.

conclusionsThis study highlights the strong correlation between mAbs and GI disorders, especially for mAbs such as atezolizumab, rituximab, and bevacizumab. The results emphasise the necessity of increased pharmacovigilance to keep an eye on these AEs and enhance patient safety. Improving patient safety during mAb therapy requires constant safety surveillance and additional research. Further investigation into the mechanisms underlying these relationships could lead to more effective management options for patients undergoing mAb therapy.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAntibodies, MonoclonalGastrointestinal DiseasesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesAntibodies, MonoclonalDisproportionality signal analysisFDA Adverse Event Reporting System Databasegastrointestinal disordersmonoclonal antibodiespharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID42583973
PMCPMC13412445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.