ArticleOral health & preventive dentistry2026
A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomisation Analysis of the Oral Microbiome and Oral/Oropharyngeal/Tongue Cancers.
Article in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the potential causal relationships of the oral microbiome with the risks of oral cancer, oropharyngeal cancer, and tongue cancer using two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis, while distinguishing these from reverse causal effects of the cancers on microbial abundance. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using single-nucleotide polymorphisms as instrumental variables, we applied the MR inverse-variance-weighted approach to evaluate the effects of the dorsal-tongue and salivary microbiomes on oral, oropharyngeal, and tongue cancers. Analyses were conducted with the R package TwoSampleMR, leveraging genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from CNGBdb, the FinnGen consortium, and other sources. Sensitivity, heterogeneity, and pleiotropy assessments were performed. Additionally, reverse MR sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the possible causal influence of cancers on the oral microbiota.
resultsUsing a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) significance threshold of p 5 × 10-6, our large-scale MR study revealed genetically supported causal relationships between microbial taxa derived from saliva and the tongue and the risk of oral, oropharyngeal, and tongue cancers. Integrating these results, we found that both 's Veillonella_rogosae_mgs_2008' and 's unclassified_mgs_1048' conferred a reduced risk of oropharyngeal and tongue cancers. Sensitivity analyses based on heterogeneity tests and pleiotropy evaluations further corroborated the robustness of our findings, lending additional credibility to the conclusions.
conclusionThis study leveraged large-scale publicly available genetic data and identified significant causal relationships between the oral microbiota and cancers of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and tongue. Reverse MR analyses indicated that oral and tongue cancers may in turn alter the abundance of specific oral microbes, suggesting a potential bidirectional causal loop. Future work should integrate metagenomic data to further validate these microbiota-cancer associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.