ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Distinct High-Gamma Signals in Primate Prefrontal Cortex Differentiate Cue Information, Preference Revision, and Expected Reward During Value-Based Decisions.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distinct High-Gamma Signals in Primate Prefrontal Cortex Differentiate Cue Information, Preference Revision, and Expected Reward During Value-Based Decisions.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how prefrontal cortex (PFC) signals evolve over time to support decision-making requires characterizing both the spectral and temporal structure of neural activity. High-gamma (Hγ) power in local field potentials (LFPs) reflects local population firing, yet its role in differentiating cue-driven preference revision, reward expectation, and outcome-related signals during reward-guided decisions remains unclear. We recorded LFPs from the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC), and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in macaques performing a multicue reward-based decision task in which up to four sequential cues indicated the expected reward associated with competing targets. Hγ power was extracted in sliding windows aligned to key task events, and support vector machine classifiers were used to decode cue-driven preference revision, reward expectation, cue value level and position, target choice, and prediction-error contrasts. Hγ responses robustly differentiated preference-reversal from confirmation trials, with subject-specific modulation patterns across PFC subregions. Cue value level and spatial position were reliably decoded across PFC, with stronger differentiation of cue value level in OFC and cue position in DLPFC. Around movement onset, Hγ activity differentiated high versus low expected reward across PFC, with decoding accuracies reaching 85% in ACC. Hγ was also modulated by unexpected reward omission, yielding 78% decoding accuracy from a single OFC channel. These findings demonstrate that Hγ activity across PFC subregions differentiates multiple computationally defined decision variables with distinct temporal profiles and overlapping regional contributions, highlighting Hγ as a robust marker of dynamic reward-guided decision processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.