ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Salvage surgery for free flap failure in the maxillofacial region: a comprehensive review of principles and outcomes.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Free tissue transfer is the cornerstone of complex maxillofacial reconstruction, offering high success rates (90-95%) but carrying the risk of devastating flap failure in 1.5-5.8% of cases. When failure occurs, it necessitates urgent, strategic decision-making to mitigate morbidity and preserve oncological and functional outcomes. Objective: This review aims to synthesize current evidence on the principles, decision-making frameworks, and outcomes of salvage surgery following free-flap failure in the maxillofacial region. Methods/findings: A comprehensive narrative review was conducted, integrating data from clinical studies, case series, and systematic reviews published between 2000 and 2024. Key themes included the etiology and timing of flap failure (predominantly venous thrombosis within 48 hours), the critical distinction between flap salvage and salvage surgery, and a multifactorial decision matrix incorporating patient, defect, oncologic, and institutional factors. Reconstructive options range from second free flaps (success rates ~67-73%) and pedicled flaps (e.g., pectoralis major) to prosthetic rehabilitation. Immediate salvage is preferred in stable patients, whereas a staged "bridge and stage" approach using negative pressure wound therapy is safer in compromised settings. Functional outcomes vary by site and technique, but salvage surgery can significantly reduce pain and improve quality of life, with curative potential in select oncologic recurrences. Conclusion: Free-flap failure, while uncommon, demands a systematic, individualized, and multidisciplinary response. With timely intervention and an appropriate reconstructive strategy - whether microvascular, pedicled, or prosthetic - salvage surgery can successfully restore form, function, and hope, transforming a surgical crisis into a manageable clinical challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.