Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42583664›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026

Salvage surgery for free flap failure in the maxillofacial region: a comprehensive review of principles and outcomes.

Ziad Albash, Wajih Kashkash, Anton Sergeevich Sharapo, Zaderenko Igor Alexandrovich, Ushenko Ilya Aleksandrovich, Saltykov Egor Michaylovich, Hassan Alsayed Hachem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ziad AlbashDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Latakia University, Latakia, Syria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2799-970X
Wajih KashkashDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Al-Andalus University, Tartus, Syria.
Anton Sergeevich SharapoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3963-505X
Zaderenko Igor AlexandrovichN.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0183-4827
Ushenko Ilya AleksandrovichDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, People's Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5147-3292
Saltykov Egor MichaylovichDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
Hassan Alsayed HachemDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3589-5102

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Free tissue transfer is the cornerstone of complex maxillofacial reconstruction, offering high success rates (90-95%) but carrying the risk of devastating flap failure in 1.5-5.8% of cases. When failure occurs, it necessitates urgent, strategic decision-making to mitigate morbidity and preserve oncological and functional outcomes. Objective: This review aims to synthesize current evidence on the principles, decision-making frameworks, and outcomes of salvage surgery following free-flap failure in the maxillofacial region. Methods/findings: A comprehensive narrative review was conducted, integrating data from clinical studies, case series, and systematic reviews published between 2000 and 2024. Key themes included the etiology and timing of flap failure (predominantly venous thrombosis within 48 hours), the critical distinction between flap salvage and salvage surgery, and a multifactorial decision matrix incorporating patient, defect, oncologic, and institutional factors. Reconstructive options range from second free flaps (success rates ~67-73%) and pedicled flaps (e.g., pectoralis major) to prosthetic rehabilitation. Immediate salvage is preferred in stable patients, whereas a staged "bridge and stage" approach using negative pressure wound therapy is safer in compromised settings. Functional outcomes vary by site and technique, but salvage surgery can significantly reduce pain and improve quality of life, with curative potential in select oncologic recurrences. Conclusion: Free-flap failure, while uncommon, demands a systematic, individualized, and multidisciplinary response. With timely intervention and an appropriate reconstructive strategy - whether microvascular, pedicled, or prosthetic - salvage surgery can successfully restore form, function, and hope, transforming a surgical crisis into a manageable clinical challenge.

Indexed as

flap salvagefree-flap failuremaxillofacial reconstructionmicrovascular reconstructionsalvage surgery

Identifiers

PMID42583664
PMCPMC13461088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.