Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42583642›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Expectations and Considerations of Research Fellowships in Plastic Surgery.

Mia D Do, Abra H Shen, Duane Wang, Jeffrey B Friedrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mia D DoFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Abra H ShenFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Duane WangFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Jeffrey B FriedrichFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The plastic surgery match is a competitive endeavor with many trainees pursuing research fellowships to strengthen their residency applications. This study aims to understand the perspectives of program directors (PDs) and applicants when evaluating research fellowships. Methods: Surveys were distributed to integrated plastic surgery residency PDs and applicants applying during the 2020-2023 application cycles. The surveys elicited information on financial considerations, ideal productivity measures, and circumstances in which a research fellowship would be beneficial for applicants. Results: A total of 110 integrated plastic surgery applicants responded to our study (13% response rate) with 46 completing research fellowships (42%). Only 57% of research fellows received full funding, with an average salary of $29,871. Thirty-one PDs responded to our survey (35% response rate). An average of 6 publications and 4 oral presentations was considered productive for a research fellowship. Although no survey respondents found completing a research fellowship to be necessary, 52% did believe it makes someone a stronger overall applicant. On average, 6 publications were considered ideal to not recommend a research fellowship for prospective applicants. Conclusions: In response to an increasingly competitive applicant cohort, we sought to elicit opinions and perceptions surrounding research fellowships for trainees hoping to successfully apply to plastic surgery residency. Although most surveyed PDs would not recommend a research fellowship to an applicant with more than 6 publications, we temper this with the understanding that applying general recommendations is difficult without a holistic view of the applicant. In addition, funding concerns act as a barrier for many trainees.

Identifiers

PMID42583642
PMCPMC13461098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.