Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42583627›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Clinical Determinants of Pharmacologic Versus Exercise Stress Testing in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Saudi Arabia.

Abdulaziz S Alqahtani, Meshaal M Alenezi, Salem F Alanazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abdulaziz S AlqahtaniNuclear Medicine, King Faisal Medical City for Southern Region (KFMCity), Abha, SAU.
Meshaal M AleneziNuclear Medicine, King Khalid Hospital (KKHH), Hail Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Hail, SAU.
Salem F AlanaziRadiology, Medical Cities Program, General Directorate of Medical Services, Ministry of Interior, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMyocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a widely utilized noninvasive imaging modality for the evaluation of coronary artery disease and cardiovascular risk stratification. The selection of stress modality during MPI is influenced by multiple demographic and clinical factors. This study aimed to assess the clinical and demographic factors associated with the selection of pharmacologic versus exercise stress testing among patients undergoing MPI at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective single-center analytical study included adult patients who underwent MPI at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Patients were categorized into exercise stress testing and pharmacologic stress testing groups according to the stress modality utilized during MPI. Demographic and clinical data including age, sex, smoking history, body mass index, cardiovascular risk factors, primary diagnoses, and associated comorbidities were extracted from institutional data collection records. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, whereas categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Comparative analyses were performed using independent t-test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test where appropriate. Statistical significance was considered at a P-value <0.05.

resultsA total of 197 patients were included in the final analysis. Among them, 147 patients (74.6%) underwent pharmacologic stress testing, whereas 50 patients (25.4%) underwent exercise stress testing. The mean age of the overall study population was 58.8 ± 10.1 years. Patients undergoing pharmacologic stress testing were significantly older than those undergoing exercise stress testing (59.8 ± 10.0 years vs. 55.9 ± 10.2 years, P = 0.02). Significant differences in sex distribution were also observed between the two groups (P = 0.006), with female patients being more frequently represented in the pharmacologic stress group. Patients undergoing pharmacologic stress testing demonstrated a greater prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, obesity, and exercise-limiting comorbidities. Ischemic heart disease represented the most frequently documented clinical diagnosis within the study population.

conclusionsPharmacologic stress testing represented the predominant stress modality among patients undergoing MPI at the tertiary care center. Advanced age, female sex, cardiovascular disease burden, and reduced exercise tolerance were associated with increased utilization of pharmacologic stress testing. Understanding the determinants of stress modality selection may contribute to the optimization of patient-centered imaging strategies, improved workflow efficiency, and enhanced nuclear cardiology practice. These findings may serve as a foundation for the development of a standardized clinical protocol to guide stress modality selection in MPI. Implementation of evidence-based selection criteria may improve consistency in clinical decision-making, optimize patient safety, and enhance the efficiency of nuclear cardiology services.

Indexed as

coronary artery diseaseexercise stress testingmyocardial perfusion imagingnuclear cardiologypharmacologic stress testingsaudi arabia

Identifiers

PMID42583627
PMCPMC13461125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.