Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42583582›Full record

ArticleJournal of mid-life health

Beyond its Rarity: A 10-year Study on Primary Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Breast from a Tertiary Care Center.

Pavithra Ethirajan, Swetha Lakshmi Narla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mid-life health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pavithra EthirajanDNB Resident, Department of Pathology, Apollo Cancer Centre, Teynampet, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Swetha Lakshmi NarlaSenior Consultant, Department of Pathology, Apollo Cancer Centre, Teynampet, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) of the breast is a rare malignancy (~0.1%), affecting women in their 50s-60s. It presents as a palpable mass with tubular, cribriform, and solid patterns and shows biphasic differentiation. C-Kit expression supports diagnosis. Despite its triple-negative status, AdCC has a favorable prognosis, except in solid-basaloid variants. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Histopathology, Apollo Cancer Center, Chennai, and included all cases of primary breast AdCC diagnosed between January 2014 and December 2024. Results: Twelve female patients were included, with a mean age of 55.5 years. All presented with a breast lump; right and left sides were equally involved, with the upper outer quadrant being the most common site (70%). Surgical management included wide local excision (WLE) (45.45%), modified radical mastectomy (36.36%), total mastectomy (9.09%), and chemotherapy/immunotherapy in one patient (9.09%). Multifocality was seen in 16.66% (2/12). Mean tumor size was 2.66 cm, and pT2 stage was most frequent (57.14%). One case showed local recurrence post-WLE; another developed lung metastasis. Histologically, 75% showed all three patterns with solid areas ranging from 10% to 90%. Perineural invasion was seen in 58.33% (7/12) and lymphovascular invasion in 16.66% (2/12). Most tumors were Nottingham Grade 2 (83.33%). All were progesterone receptor and HER2/neu negative; estrogen receptor positivity was seen in two cases. C-Kit was positive in all tested cases. Ki-67 index ranged from 6% to 80%. Conclusion: Breast AdCC shows favorable prognosis. Most cases were pT2, stage IIA, with rare recurrence or metastasis.

Indexed as

Adenoid cysticbreast neoplasmscarcinomasalivary gland neoplasmtriple negative

Identifiers

PMID42583582
PMCPMC13460693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.