ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Mid-term safety and feasibility of an absorbable gelatin film adhesion barrier after laparoscopic colorectal resection.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the current increase in life expectancy, the likelihood of undergoing multiple abdominal surgeries has risen. Adhesions from previous operations can prolong operative time, increase the risk of organ injury, and cause adhesive small bowel obstruction. Materials and methods: We evaluated the mid-term safety and feasibility of an absorbable gelatin film adhesion barrier (TENALEAF Results: Tumor sites were the right colon in 48 cases, the left colon in 55, and the rectum in 47. The median operative time was 189.5 minutes (range: 95-544), and blood loss was 5 mL (range: 5-340). AGF was applied successfully in all cases. Postoperative complications included two superficial surgical site infections, one intra-abdominal abscess, one anastomotic leakage, and three cases of paralytic ileus. No adhesive bowel obstruction or AGF-related adverse events were observed during follow-up exceeding 1 year. Conclusion: AGF demonstrated safety and feasibility in preventing postoperative adhesions after laparoscopic colorectal resection. Further follow-up and case accumulation will be required to confirm long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.