ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Status of ocular health and binocular vision among children using digital devices: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the advancement of technologies, there is an increase in the usage of electronic devices like computers, tablets, and smartphones for both vocational and avocational purposes. This causes an increased effort for near vision, which ultimately leads to increased accommodation/convergence and decreased, infrequent blinking. Digital eye strain is a manifestation of evaporative dry eye caused by a decreased, incomplete blink rate, leading to ocular surface compromise, and asthenopic symptoms caused by problems of accommodation and convergence. This study aims to assess the status of ocular health and binocular vision among children using digital devices. Materials and methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 106 children aged 9-18 years at the pediatric and strabismus department of Lumbini Eye Institute and Research Centre, Rupandehi, Nepal. All the children underwent detailed ophthalmic and binocular vision examinations. Schirmer II was performed as a quantitative test for the evaluation of dry eye. Subjects were asked about the types of digital devices they use, the amount of time they spend on them every day, how long they have been using digital devices, and the visual symptoms they experienced at the end of the day. Results: The prevalence of computer vision syndrome (CVS) was 86.8%. Headache was the most common symptom reported. CVS-related symptoms were not statistically associated with the hours of usage of a digital device ( Conclusion: This study suggests that there is a greater prevalence of CVS and convergence insufficiency in children using digital devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.