ArticleCureus2026
A Rare Case of Endometrial Ossifying Cartilaginous Metaplasia.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial ossification, also described as endometrial osseous metaplasia (EOM), is a rare benign condition characterized by the presence of bone tissue within the endometrium. Its exact etiopathogenesis remains unclear, although the metaplasia of endometrial stromal cells into osteoblast-like cells has been proposed as the most accepted mechanism. Clinically, it may present with infertility, abnormal uterine bleeding, or pelvic discomfort and, in rare situations, may mimic more serious gynecological pathology. We report the case of a 60-year-old postmenopausal woman who presented with persistent vaginal bleeding, vaginal discharge, and a protruding vaginal mass causing discomfort. She had a long history of recurrent postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) and previously diagnosed benign endometrial polyps managed with hysteroscopic polypectomy. Imaging revealed a markedly thickened, inhomogeneous endometrium with multiple polypoidal lesions and calcifications, raising suspicion for endometrial malignancy with possible cervical involvement. Due to persistent symptoms, suspicious imaging findings, and the patient's multiple comorbidities, a robotic total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. Histopathological examination unexpectedly revealed the ossifying cartilaginous metaplasia of the endometrial stroma involving the endometrium and an endometrial polyp, with no evidence of malignancy. The patient had an uneventful recovery and remained asymptomatic on follow-up. This case highlights how a rare benign diagnosis can present in a complex clinical scenario mimicking malignancy. The awareness of such entities is important to avoid misdiagnosis and to emphasize the crucial role of histopathology and multidisciplinary management in achieving safe, patient-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.