Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42583417›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026

Evolutionary patterns and research frontiers in ventilator-induced lung injury: a bibliometric analysis (2000-2024).

Yingliang Wu, Linghui Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yingliang WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China.
Linghui PanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is a major complication of mechanical ventilation and contributes substantially to morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Despite extensive investigations into the pathophysiological mechanisms and preventive strategies of VILI, the global research landscape, collaborative networks, and emerging trends in this field have not been comprehensively characterized. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the development, research hotspots, and future directions of VILI research through bibliometric analysis. Methods: Publications related to VILI published between 2000 and 2024 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Bibliometric indicators, including annual publication output, citations, countries, institutions, authors, journals, and keywords, were analyzed. Visualization and network analyses were conducted using Bibliometrix (R package), VOSviewer, and CiteSpace to identify research collaborations, influential contributors, knowledge structures, and emerging research themes. Results: A total of 4,055 publications were included in the analysis. The annual number of publications (NP) and citations demonstrated a sustained upward trend, reflecting growing scientific interest in VILI. The United States was the leading contributor in terms of publication output, citations, and international collaborations. Harvard University and other major academic institutions played central roles in advancing the field. Highly cited studies primarily focused on lung-protective ventilation strategies, mechanical stress-induced inflammatory responses, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Keyword co-occurrence, burst detection, and thematic analyses revealed that inflammation, oxidative stress, NLRP3 inflammasome activation, epithelial and endothelial barrier dysfunction, mechanotransduction, and precision ventilation strategies have emerged as major research hotspots. Recent studies increasingly focus on molecular mechanisms and translational interventions aimed at reducing ventilator-associated lung damage. Conclusions: Research on VILI has expanded substantially over the past two decades, with increasing global collaboration and diversification of research themes. Current hotspots have shifted from clinical ventilation strategies toward mechanistic investigations involving inflammatory signaling pathways and cellular injury processes. These findings provide a comprehensive overview of the intellectual structure and developmental trajectory of VILI research and may help guide future basic, translational, and clinical investigations in this field.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysisinflammationmechanical ventilationNLRP3 inflammasomeVentilator-induced lung injury (VILI)

Identifiers

PMID42583417
PMCPMC13460119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.