ArticleActa ortopedica brasileira2026
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TRAUMATOLOGY AND ORTHOPEDICS: A BIBLIOMETRIC STUDY.
Article in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to map the scientific production of the National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics (INTO) over its 50 years of history. Methods: We conducted a descriptive bibliometric study in the PubMed, Scopus, and BVS databases, retrieving 522 articles published between 2007 and 2024. We identified the co-citation networks of INTO-affiliated authors, the keyword networks with the main topics addressed in the publications, and the institution's interaction network with other research and teaching entities. Results: There was a progressive growth in publications linked to INTO. In the last six years (2019-2024), the annual average number of publications increased by 44.83% compared with the previous period. The keywords with the highest co-occurrence were related to applied research, mainly with an epidemiological profile, but also to different study designs in basic and translational research. Conclusions: The analysis revealed a higher frequency of collaboration with public universities (UFRJ, UFF, UERJ, and USP). The institution's scientific production presented a well-articulated scientific collaboration network. Part of INTO's mission was evidenced through its work in public health research for health promotion in orthopedics and its contribution to the production of data for the formulation of public policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.