Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42583382›Full record

ArticleNational science review2026

Optical-cavity-driven photogenerated charge separation revealed by spatiotemporal imaging.

Chenwei Ni, Thomas Dittrich, Jianbo Tang, Guanhua Zhang, Qian Li, Meng Liu, Fengke Sun, Bing Huang, Yixian Cao, Wenming Tian and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Chenwei NiState Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Thomas DittrichHelmholtz-Center Berlin for Materials and Energy GmbH, Berlin D-12489, Germany.
Jianbo TangState Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Guanhua ZhangState Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Qian LiState Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Meng LiuState Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Fengke SunState Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Bing HuangState Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Yixian CaoState Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Wenming TianState Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Kaifeng WuState Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Fengtao FanState Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Ruotian ChenState Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Can LiState Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photogenerated charge separation across micro- to nanometer scales is essential for photoelectric and photocatalytic conversion. However, identifying microstructures that sustain efficient charge separation and elucidating the underlying mechanisms remain challenging. Here, by combining surface photovoltage microscopy with optical imaging, we show that optically resonant cavity structures generate highly non-uniform light-field distributions that subsequently drive efficient charge separation through asymmetric electron and hole diffusivities. Spatiotemporal imaging of carrier dynamics from femtoseconds to seconds reveals that this charge separation originates from the combined contributions of ultrafast hot-electron diffusion (∼3 ps) and long-lived trap-limited transport (∼5 ms). Leveraging these effects, we demonstrate control over both the magnitude and direction of charge separation via optical structure engineering. These findings deepen the fundamental understanding of diffusion-driven charge separation in semiconductors and establish optical-architecture engineering as a viable approach for manipulating this process, providing a blueprint for advancing solar energy conversion and optoelectronic technologies.

Indexed as

carrier diffusion dynamicscharge separationoptical cavityspatiotemporal imagingsurface photovoltage

Identifiers

PMID42583382
PMCPMC13459972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.