Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42583375›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026

"Adjunctive topical amphotericin B in post-transplant surgical-site mucormycosis in an immunocompromised diabetic patient: a case report".

Sai Nikhitha Malapati, Shyam Sunder Muktinootalapati, Ashok Adhikari, Sai Geethika Malapati, Apsha Shrestha

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sai Nikhitha MalapatiKamineni Academy of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Hyderabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6256-3833
Shyam Sunder MuktinootalapatiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kamineni Academy of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Hyderabad, India.
Ashok AdhikariDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universal College of Medical Sciences, Bhairahawa, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9888-8868
Sai Geethika MalapatiDepartment of Internal Medicine, ESIC Medical College & PGIMSR, Hyderabad, India.
Apsha ShresthaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universal College of Medical Sciences, Bhairahawa, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cutaneous mucormycosis is a rapidly progressive and often fatal fungal infection predominantly affecting immunocompromised hosts, with post-transplant patients being particularly vulnerable due to immunosuppressive regimens and metabolic derangements. Despite its high mortality, especially in the context of surgical-site involvement, optimal therapeutic strategies remain underexplored. We present a rare case of surgical-site mucormycosis in a renal transplant recipient with poorly controlled diabetes, successfully managed using adjunctive topical antifungal therapy, highlighting a potential treatment strategy in immunosuppressed populations. Case discussion: A middle-aged male with chronic kidney disease, recent renal transplantation, and persistent hyperglycemia developed a non-healing surgical-site wound. Early clinical suspicion led to a bedside potassium hydroxide mount and expedited fungal cultures, which revealed mucormycosis. The patient was promptly initiated on systemic liposomal amphotericin B and, uniquely, adjunctive topical amphotericin B applied directly to the wound bed. Despite the challenges of ongoing immunosuppression, renal dysfunction, and glycemic instability, the patient demonstrated significant local and systemic improvement without the need for disfiguring surgical debridement. Discussion: This case underscores the diagnostic value of bedside fungal microscopy in resource-limited and time-sensitive settings, where conventional culture and histopathology may be delayed. The clinical decision to incorporate topical amphotericin B, an underutilized yet mechanistically sound adjunct, was based on the rationale of high local fungal burden, systemic drug toxicity concerns, and limited evidence in immunosuppressed surgical cohorts. This approach not only curtailed disease progression but also preserved graft integrity and patient quality of life. This case highlights the under-recognition of mucormycosis in post-transplant surgical wounds and the absence of standardized topical antifungal protocols, representing a critical gap in transplant infectious disease management. Conclusion: This case report highlights that early bedside diagnosis, combined with individualized adjunctive topical amphotericin B, may help control post-transplant surgical-site mucormycosis, reduce the need for morbid surgical interventions, and warrants further evaluation for incorporation into future treatment guidelines for high-risk immunocompromised patients.

Indexed as

amphotericin Bimmunocompromised hostmucormycosisopportunistic infectionssurgical wound infection

Identifiers

PMID42583375
PMCPMC13460973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.