Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42583359›Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2026

Examining family and facility characteristics associated with family satisfaction in assisted living: the Minnesota Assisted Living Report Card project.

Tetyana P Shippee, Romil R Parikh, Molin Ji, Timothy J Beebe, Mark Woodhouse, Martina Johnson, Julie Angert, Lauren Glass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tetyana P ShippeeDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1804-2527
Romil R ParikhDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6087-0583
Molin JiDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6533-7740
Timothy J BeebeDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Mark WoodhouseDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Martina JohnsonAging and Adult Services Division, Minnesota Department of Human Services, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States.
Julie AngertAging and Adult Services Division, Minnesota Department of Human Services, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States.
Lauren GlassAging and Adult Services Division, Minnesota Department of Human Services, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Family members play an essential role in monitoring and advocating for quality of care in assisted living (AL) communities. Despite their importance, few population-based studies have examined how family and facility characteristics influence family satisfaction in AL. We evaluated family and facility characteristics associated with family satisfaction in AL. Methods: Using cross-sectional survey data from the Minnesota Assisted Living Report Card project (2024), we identified resident- and facility-level predictors of AL resident-reported quality of life in 8 domains, including experience, choice, needs, housekeeping, food, environment, staff, and overall satisfaction, using multivariable linear mixed regression with facility-level random intercept to account for facility-level clustering. Results: Among 15 320 family member respondents in licensed AL facilities with more than 5 beds (51.1% of age <65 years, 65.4% female, 92.3% White), mean domain scores ranged from 67.2 (Food) to 82.1 (Overall), indicating generally positive perceptions. Across all domains, lower satisfaction was observed among respondents who are younger, people of color, and female, and among spouses or siblings of residents. Families visiting or communicating less frequently tended to report lower satisfaction with choice and overall satisfaction. Smaller and non-profit facilities received higher ratings across most domains, while facilities in the Twin Cities metropolitan area scored higher than those in the rest of the state. Discussion and Implications: Family satisfaction in AL reflects both family composition and facility context. Policymakers and providers can leverage family satisfaction metrics to inform targeted quality improvement and promote equitable, family-centered care across the AL sector.

Indexed as

Long-term carePerson-centered carePerson-reported measuresQuality measurement

Identifiers

PMID42583359
PMCPMC13459960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.