Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42583357›Full record

ArticleCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada2026

Assessing public health threats: An overview of coordinated threat assessment at the Public Health Agency of Canada.

Gabrielle Brankston, Ekim Bagree, Rukshanda Ahmad, Camille Dulong, Catherine Elliott, Eleni Galanis, Jacqueline Middleton, Amrit Sandhu, Lindsay Whitmore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Using a consensus-based approach to build a threat assessment tool for use in a Canadian federal public health setting.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gabrielle BrankstonApplied Public Health Sciences Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Ekim BagreeApplied Public Health Sciences Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Rukshanda AhmadApplied Public Health Sciences Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Camille DulongApplied Public Health Sciences Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Catherine ElliottApplied Public Health Sciences Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Eleni GalanisApplied Public Health Sciences Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Jacqueline MiddletonApplied Public Health Sciences Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Amrit SandhuApplied Public Health Sciences Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Lindsay WhitmoreApplied Public Health Sciences Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The early detection, assessment, and communication of potential public health threats are key activities in mitigating public health impacts by ensuring the timely deployment of an appropriate response. The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) uses a standardized methodology to consolidate scientific and technical subject matter expertise on a weekly basis to systematically characterize and assess emerging public health signals and communicate assessments to decision-makers. Methods: Public Health Agency of Canada's coordinated threat assessment process, and the standardized methodology used to characterize and assess threats, are described. Results: The coordinated threat assessment methodology uses a standardized method that includes engagement with subject matter experts across PHAC to assess, document, and communicate the characterization of each threat. Three key attributes are used to assess each threat based on the concern for human health, the potential to affect Canada, and the concern that Canada has insufficient control measures to manage a specific threat. Qualitative criteria for each threat attribute are used to assess a threat based on 'high', 'moderate', or 'low' levels. An overall assessment is based on the three threat attributes and is accompanied by a narrative rationale to support the assigned threat level. Conclusion: The standardized threat assessment methodology provides a coordinated and systematic process to characterize and assess public health threats in a consistent and timely manner. The framework reflects important elements to consider in terms of public health significance, allows for flexibility in the indicators used to characterize a public health threat, and is applicable to any threat of public health concern.

Indexed as

frameworkmethodpublic healthpublic health intelligencethreat assessmenttool

Identifiers

PMID42583357
PMCPMC13460287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.