ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Targeted intrapleural analgesia through an integrated chest tube after thoracoscopic lung resection: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated drainage-analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery: cautionary optimism amidst evolving multimodal guidelines.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Integrated chest-tube analgesia after thoracoscopic surgery: rethinking the role of chest tubes.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- A drainage-analgesia integrated chest tube for pain control after thoracoscopic lung resection.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- From pain generator to analgesic platform: is the chest tube part of the solution after video- or robotic assisted thoracoscopic surgery?Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chest drains are a major contributor to postoperative pain after thoracoscopic lung resection. Localized intrapleural analgesia delivered through the drain itself may provide targeted pain control without additional catheters. This study evaluated whether a drainage-analgesia integrated (DAI) chest tube improves postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Methods: In this prospective single-center, open-label randomized trial, 47 patients undergoing VATS were allocated to receive either a DAI chest tube (n=22) or standard drainage (STD) chest tube (n=25). Both groups received identical multimodal systemic analgesia, including intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with a continuous background sufentanil infusion. The primary endpoint was the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at 24 hours. The secondary outcomes included PCA activation frequency, sufentanil consumption, drainage outcomes, adverse events, and Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores. Results: Compared with the STD group, the DAI group had lower VAS pain scores at 24 and 48 hours after surgery (P<0.05). Total sufentanil consumption was similar between the two groups (P=0.49); however, the number of PCA activations was lower in the DAI group than in the STD group (0.1±0.4 Conclusions: In this open-label randomized trial conducted under a standardized background sufentanil PCA regimen, intrapleural local anesthetic delivery through an integrated chest tube was associated with lower early postoperative pain scores and fewer PCA activation attempts. This strategy may represent a simple approach for targeted analgesia within enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways for thoracic surgery. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2500115142.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.