ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Evolution, hotspots, and future directions of artificial intelligence in asthma research: a Web of Science-based bibliometric analysis [2016-2026].
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While artificial intelligence (AI) offers unprecedented capabilities for predictive modeling and precision asthma management, there is an urgent clinical necessity to successfully translate these rapid algorithmic innovations into real-world respiratory care. The exponential growth of cross-disciplinary AI literature has paradoxically created information overload for clinicians, obscuring underlying translational friction and hindering evidence-based implementation. Consequently, bibliometric analysis serves as the optimal quantitative vehicle to decode this vast scientific architecture. This study aims to objectively map the evolutionary trajectory, global research landscape, and emerging hotspots of AI in asthma, providing actionable roadmaps to reconcile computational development with clinical practice. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted utilizing the Web of Science Core Collection database for studies related to AI in asthma, with the retrieval timeframe updated from January 1, 2016, to June 4, 2026. Following strict inclusion and exclusion criteria (restricted to English-language original articles and peer-reviewed reviews), a finalized dataset of 1,967 publications was extracted. Raw metadata parameters, including citations and bibliographic information, were exported for network topology analysis. Data synthesis was executed using specific algorithmic parameters in CiteSpace (for structural centrality and citation burst detection), VOSviewer (for co-authorship and keyword clustering), and the Bibliometrix R-package (for thematic evolution mapping). Results: The field has experienced robust exponential growth (22.24% per annum), with a pivotal inflection point in 2019. Geographically, a dual-centric geopolitical landscape exists between the United States and China in publication volume; yet, the United Kingdom serves as the ultimate global hub with superior network centrality, alongside highly integrated networks from nations like Australia and France. Institutional analysis highlights a productive yet fragmented landscape driven by prolific powerhouses such as Harvard Medical School and Imperial College London, while high-centrality nodes like the University of Zurich and Johns Hopkins University cross-link clinical and algorithmic clusters. Thematically, the field has undergone a distinct three-epoch technological trajectory: from early statistical clustering [2016-2019] to machine learning-based electronic health record mining [2020-2023], and recently to advanced deep learning architectures and multi-modal integration [2024-2026]. Current research frontiers focus on multi-omics precision phenotyping, real-time exacerbation prediction via wearables, and causal inference for personalized therapy. Conclusions: While AI paradigms in asthma research have rapidly advanced, current literature is fundamentally constrained by profound translational friction stemming from an over-reliance on retrospective datasets, which introduces critical structural biases and limits clinical generalizability. To effectively translate algorithms into clinical utility, future research must urgently deploy federated learning frameworks to securely overcome global data silos, and prioritize prospective, multicenter pragmatic trials to validate AI-driven predictive interventions in real-world respiratory care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.