Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42583193›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference2019

Facilitating Self-reflection about Values and Self-care among Individuals with Chronic Conditions.

Catherine Y Lim, Andrew B L Berry, Andrea L Hartzler, Tad Hirsch, David S Carrell, Zoë A Bermet, James D Ralston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Informing the Design of Individualized Self-Management Regimens from the Human, Data, and Machine Learning Perspectives.ACM transactions on computer-human interaction : a publication of the Association for Computing Machinery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. "You Can See the Connections": Facilitating Visualization of Care Priorities in People Living with Multiple Chronic Health Conditions.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2023
    Article
  7. "I Wanted to See How Bad it Was": Online Self-screening as a Critical Transition Point Among Young Adults with Common Mental Health Conditions.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Supporting collaborative reflection on personal values and health.Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction · 2021
    Article
  12. "Taking care of myself as long as I can": How People with Dementia Configure Self-Management Systems.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Catherine Y LimKaiser Permanente, Washington Health, Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andrew B L BerryUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andrea L HartzlerUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Tad HirschNortheastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
David S CarrellKaiser Permanente, Washington Health, Research Institute.
Zoë A BermetKaiser Permanente, Washington Health, Research Institute.
James D RalstonKaiser Permanente, Washington Health, Research Institute.

Funding

Seeing and Sharing What Matters: Personal Health Libraries for Individuals with Multiple Chronic ConditionsR01LM012813 · NLM · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI RALSTON, JAMES D. · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) experience the overwhelming burden of treating MCC and frequently disagree with their providers on priorities for care. Aligning self-care with patients' values may improve healthcare for these patients. However, patients' values are not routinely discussed in clinical conversations and patients may not actively share this information with providers. In a qualitative field study, we interviewed 15 patients in their homes to investigate techniques that encourage patients to articulate values, self-care, and how they relate. Study activities facilitated self-reflection on values and self-care and produced varying responses, including: raising consciousness, evolving perspectives, identifying misalignments, and considering changes. We discuss how our findings extend prior work on supporting reflection in HCI and inform the design of tools for improving care for people with MCC.

Indexed as

healthmultimorbidityMultiple chronic conditionsreflectionself-carevalues

Identifiers

PMID42583193
PMCPMC13459736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.