ArticleNursing research and practice2026
Improving the Effectiveness of Intentional Rounding: A Quality Improvement Project.
Article in Nursing research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving the Effectiveness of Intentional Rounding: A Quality Improvement Project.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ineffective intentional rounding (IR) may lead to missed care opportunities and an increased risk of adverse events. Quality improvement (QI) strategies may enhance nurses' compliance with rounding protocols and improve patient safety. Objective: To evaluate the impact of a multifaceted QI program on the rate of effective IR and the incidence of nursing-related adverse events. Methods: This pre-post study was conducted at a tertiary hospital. The department of nursing-level interventions included the following: revising the scope of required hourly patient rounds to direct nurses' attention toward elderly patients and those at high risk of falls; mandating that nurses could only document round completion by scanning either patient wristbands or bedside QR codes containing patient information; and providing standardized, organization-wide training. Ward-level interventions included disease-specific training, high-risk time reminders, establishing standardized effective round assessment forms, monthly reviews by liaison nurses, and regular random checks by the QI team. Effective round rates and adverse events (including unplanned extubation, intravenous injection safety events, and falls) were compared before and after implementation. Outcome: The timely rounding rate for first-level nursing increased significantly from 77.46% in 2023 to 91.89% in Q4 2024 ( Conclusion: The multifaceted QI program improved nurses' compliance with IR processes and was associated with improvements in selected nursing safety indicators. Sustaining these gains requires continuous monitoring, targeted feedback, and adaptive reinforcement strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.