Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42583127›Full record

ArticleESMO gastrointestinal oncology2026

Current practices and challenges in the management of nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results of an EORTC survey.

C Bouchart, M Delaye, I Garajova, A Sa Cunha, F Huguet, C Neuzillet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

C BouchartDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B.), Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.
M DelayeGI Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Curie - Site Saint Cloud, Versailles Saint-Quentin University, Paris Saclay University, Saint-Cloud, Molecular Oncology, UMR144, Institute Curie, Paris, France.
I GarajovaMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
A Sa CunhaDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation-Paul Brousse Centre, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
F HuguetService d'oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Tenon, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Paris, France.
C NeuzilletGI Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Curie - Site Saint Cloud, Versailles Saint-Quentin University, Paris Saclay University, Saint-Cloud, Molecular Oncology, UMR144, Institute Curie, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The optimal therapeutic strategy for nonmetastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains controversial. This study sought to provide an overview of contemporary clinical management patterns across Europe. Materials and methods: A survey was designed by a multidisciplinary team under the aegis of the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, providing insights into initial diagnosis, surgery, and clinical management of patients with resectable, borderline resectable (BR), and locally advanced (LA) PDAC. Results: Eighty-three practitioners from 16 European countries answered the survey. In cases of resectable PDAC, frontline surgery was the preferred option (74%) followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (22%). For BR PDAC, the preferred induction strategy was chemotherapy alone (70%). Radiotherapy (RT) was proposed to be added after chemotherapy in cases of poor response or persistence of vascular contact (37%). For LA PDAC, the panel's strategies were (i) induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (42%), (ii) chemotherapy alone (35%), and (iii) chemotherapy followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy (23%). In cases of very good response without remaining vascular contact or with a carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) normalization after induction chemotherapy, cancellation of the planned RT, leading to immediate surgical exploration, was proposed in 77% and 42%, respectively. Conclusion: This European survey highlights the significant heterogeneity in PDAC clinical practices and the frequent reconsideration and adaptation of the initially planned therapeutic strategies according to treatment response, a question not explored in clinical trials. This study demonstrates the urgent need to harmonize practices in Europe.

Indexed as

chemotherapyneoadjuvant treatmentpancreatic adenocarcinomaradiotherapytreatment strategies

Identifiers

PMID42583127
PMCPMC13459565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.