Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42583116›Full record

ArticleCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada2026

Using a consensus-based approach to build a threat assessment tool for use in a Canadian federal public health setting.

Gabrielle Brankston, Camille Dulong, Catherine Elliott, Jacqueline Middleton, Amrit Sandhu, Lindsay Whitmore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Assessing public health threats: An overview of coordinated threat assessment at the Public Health Agency of Canada.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabrielle BrankstonApplied Public Health Sciences Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Camille DulongApplied Public Health Sciences Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Catherine ElliottApplied Public Health Sciences Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Jacqueline MiddletonApplied Public Health Sciences Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Amrit SandhuApplied Public Health Sciences Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Lindsay WhitmoreApplied Public Health Sciences Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Public health intelligence activities, including assessment of emerging public health threats, are core operations for many public health agencies. Threat assessment is intended to guide public health actions proportional to the assessed threat level within the context of an evolving situation. A risk-based threat assessment framework helps clarify the overall population-level health impacts of threats, guiding appropriate public health action. Objective: This work aimed to develop a standardized, risk-based tool for assessing public health threats that could be used across the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), integrating diverse perspectives from various PHAC stakeholders to ensure the tool is applicable across the full entire spectrum of potential public health threats. Methods: A threat assessment framework was developed to assign an overall threat level based on the assessment of three distinct threat attributes: the severity of harm to human health, the degree to which a threat is likely to impact Canada, and Canada's capacity to prevent or mitigate the threat. A Delphi-based approach was used to develop a set of qualitative criteria enabling end-users to assign a rating of high, moderate, or low for each threat attribute and the overall assessment. Results: Three iterative surveys and two meetings led to consensus on definitions for the three threat attributes and the overall assessment, enabling a flexible framework capable of characterizing a wide range of public health threats. Conclusion: Standardized, broadly accepted definitions for threat assessment reliably characterize and communicate public health events of importance and provide support for public health action.

Indexed as

consensusDelphipublic health intelligencethreat assessment method

Identifiers

PMID42583116
PMCPMC13459858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.