ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2026
Adolescent advisory groups in the ALIVE study: Feasibility and acceptability in global mental health prevention research.
Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adolescent involvement in mental health prevention research remains limited in low-resource settings. This study examined the feasibility, acceptability, processes and perceived impacts of adolescent advisory groups (AAGs) within the ALIVE research in Colombia, Nepal and South Africa. Using a convergent mixed-methods design, we analysed data collected between October 2022 and August 2025 using surveys with adolescents (t1: n = 33; t2: n = 26), focus group discussions (n = 6 with adolescents; n = 2 with caregivers), interviews (n = 8 with adolescents; n = 5 with facilitators), process documents (n = 58) and post-session feedback (n = 7). Participation was highly valued by most adolescents, who were motivated by altruism, peer connection, skill development and project incentives. Most adolescents strongly agreed they could express their views freely (t1: 79%; t2: 81%) and felt listened to (t1:76%; t2: 81%, respectively). Participants reported experiences of trust, confidence and collective agency; challenges included stigma, unequal participation and logistical barriers. Facilitators' relational and adaptive support appeared central to sustaining engagement. Adolescent members contributed in important ways to the ALIVE research. Adolescent involvement in prevention research in low-resource settings is feasible and can be experienced by participants as valuable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.